On February 16, 2025, the Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, was shaken by the tragic death of 20-year-old Nepali student Prakriti Lamsal. A third-year B.Tech Computer Science student, Prakriti was found deceased in her hostel room, with initial investigations suggesting suicide.
This heart-wrenching incident has ignited widespread protests, raised questions about campus safety, and drawn international attention, particularly due to the alleged mishandling of the situation by the university administration.
The Incident Unfolds
Prakriti’s lifeless body was discovered on a Sunday evening, leading to immediate unrest among the student community. Peers alleged that she had been enduring harassment from a fellow student, which she had reported to the university’s International Relations Office. However, they claim no substantial action was taken, leaving her vulnerable and distressed.
In response to these allegations, local authorities detained a male student for questioning, registering a case under sections pertaining to abetment of suicide. Deputy Commissioner of Police Pinak Mishra stated that the accused is in custody, and electronic devices belonging to both students have been seized for forensic analysis. (NDTV)
Campus Protests and Administrative Response
The news of Prakriti’s death sparked immediate protests from the student body, particularly among the Nepali students. They accused the university administration of negligence, citing the lack of response to Prakriti’s prior harassment complaints. Demonstrations escalated, leading to tensions on campus.
In an attempt to manage the situation, KIIT authorities issued a notice declaring the campus closed “sine die” for all international students from Nepal, instructing them to vacate the premises immediately. This abrupt directive affected over 500 Nepali students, who were transported to various railway stations without adequate support or clear instructions. (The Indian Express)
International Repercussions
The handling of the situation drew sharp criticism, including from Nepal’s Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, who condemned the forced eviction of Nepali students and sought assistance from Indian authorities to ensure their safety and well-being. The Nepalese government engaged in diplomatic discussions, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into Prakriti’s death and the subsequent treatment of Nepali nationals at KIIT. (NDTV)
KIIT’s Position and Measures Taken
In response to the escalating crisis, KIIT released a statement expressing deep sorrow over Prakriti’s demise. The university acknowledged that she had been in a relationship with the accused student and suggested that personal issues might have led to her tragic decision. However, this perspective was met with skepticism by the student community, who felt it undermined the gravity of the harassment allegations.
Facing mounting pressure, the university appealed to the evacuated Nepali students to return to campus, assuring them of safety and a commitment to address their concerns. However, many students remained apprehensive, citing a lack of trust in the administration’s promises. (Hindustan Times)
Five Key Questions That Remain Unanswered
1. Why was Prakriti’s complaint not acted upon?
If she had reported harassment, why did the university fail to take timely action? Was there a gap in the internal complaint redressal system?
2. What role did the accused play in her suicide?
While the detained student is under investigation, what evidence links him to abetment of suicide? What conversations or interactions took place between them before the tragedy?
3. Why were Nepali students forced to leave campus?
The sudden expulsion of over 500 Nepali students was highly unusual. Was it a reaction to protests, or was the administration trying to suppress unrest?
4. Did Prakriti show signs of distress that were ignored?
Were there missed warning signs from teachers, friends, or hostel authorities? Did she reach out to anyone for help before taking this extreme step?
5. What steps will KIIT take to prevent such incidents in the future?
Has KIIT reviewed its grievance handling mechanisms? Will the university introduce mental health support and strict policies against harassment?
Broader Implications and the Call for Change
Prakriti Lamsal’s untimely death has cast a spotlight on critical issues such as:
• Campus safety for international students
• Harassment complaint handling
• Mental health support in universities
• Administrative accountability
This incident underscores the urgent need for universities to establish robust mechanisms for addressing harassment complaints and providing adequate counseling services. It also highlights the importance of cultural sensitivity and support for international students, ensuring they feel secure and valued within the campus community.
As investigations continue, there is a collective call for justice for Prakriti and systemic reforms to prevent such tragedies in the future. The hope is that this devastating event will serve as a catalyst for meaningful change, fostering an environment where all students can pursue their education free from fear and discrimination.
